| Title |
Proof of the umbral moonshine conjecture
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Research in the Mathematical Sciences, December 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s40687-015-0044-7 |
| Authors |
John F. R. Duncan, Michael J. Griffin, Ken Ono |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 21 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 10% |
| Unknown | 19 | 90% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 5 | 24% |
| Other | 4 | 19% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 14% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 10% |
| Other | 3 | 14% |
| Unknown | 2 | 10% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Mathematics | 8 | 38% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 7 | 33% |
| Engineering | 2 | 10% |
| Decision Sciences | 1 | 5% |
| Environmental Science | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 2 | 10% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 April 2021.
All research outputs
#8,533,995
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Research in the Mathematical Sciences
#14
of 91 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#125,254
of 394,829 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Research in the Mathematical Sciences
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 91 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 394,829 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them