↓ Skip to main content

Foraging behaviour in domestic pigs (Sus scrofa): remembering and prioritizing food sites of different value

Overview of attention for article published in Animal Cognition, November 2004
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
3 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
49 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
109 Mendeley
Title
Foraging behaviour in domestic pigs (Sus scrofa): remembering and prioritizing food sites of different value
Published in
Animal Cognition, November 2004
DOI 10.1007/s10071-004-0242-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

S Held, J Baumgartner, A KilBride, R W Byrne, M Mendl

Abstract

This experiment investigated whether domestic pigs can remember the locations of food sites of different relative value, and how a restricted retrieval choice affects their foraging behaviour. Nine juvenile female pigs were trained to relocate two food sites out of a possible eight in a spatial memory task. The two baited sites contained different amounts of food and an obstacle was added to the smaller amount to increase handling time. On each trial, a pig searched for the two baited sites (search visit). Once it had found and eaten the bait, it returned for a second (relocation) visit, in which the two same sites were baited. Baited sites were changed between trials. All subjects learnt the task. When allowed to retrieve both baits, the subjects showed no preference for retrieving a particular one first (experiment 1). When they were allowed to retrieve only one bait, a significant overall preference for retrieving the larger amount emerged across subjects (experiment 2). To test whether this preference reflected an avoidance of the obstacle with the smaller bait, 15 choice-restricted control trials were conducted. In control trials obstacles were present with both baits. Pigs continued to retrieve the larger bait, indicating they had discriminated between the two food sites on the basis of quantity or profitability and adjusted their behaviour accordingly when the relocation choice was restricted. This suggests for the first time that domestic pigs have the ability to discriminate between food sites of different relative value and to remember their respective locations.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 109 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 3%
France 2 2%
Germany 2 2%
Brazil 2 2%
Unknown 100 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 26 24%
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 18%
Student > Master 14 13%
Student > Bachelor 9 8%
Professor 6 6%
Other 19 17%
Unknown 15 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 48 44%
Psychology 11 10%
Environmental Science 7 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 3%
Arts and Humanities 3 3%
Other 10 9%
Unknown 27 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 37. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 June 2022.
All research outputs
#930,892
of 22,663,969 outputs
Outputs from Animal Cognition
#226
of 1,441 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,059
of 62,205 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Animal Cognition
#2
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,663,969 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,441 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 62,205 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.