↓ Skip to main content

Using maize as a model to study pollen tube growth and guidance, cross-incompatibility and sperm delivery in grasses

Overview of attention for article published in Annals of Botany, February 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (82nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (72nd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
65 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
132 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Using maize as a model to study pollen tube growth and guidance, cross-incompatibility and sperm delivery in grasses
Published in
Annals of Botany, February 2011
DOI 10.1093/aob/mcr017
Pubmed ID
Authors

Thomas Dresselhaus, Andreas Lausser, Mihaela L. Márton

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 132 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Portugal 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
Czechia 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
China 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 123 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 35 27%
Researcher 20 15%
Student > Master 15 11%
Student > Bachelor 9 7%
Professor 9 7%
Other 25 19%
Unknown 19 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 80 61%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 17 13%
Environmental Science 5 4%
Social Sciences 2 2%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 2%
Other 3 2%
Unknown 23 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 July 2021.
All research outputs
#4,312,846
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Botany
#1,553
of 3,723 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,641
of 119,226 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Botany
#6
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,723 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 119,226 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.