↓ Skip to main content

Cost effectiveness analysis of strategies for maternal and neonatal health in developing countries

Overview of attention for article published in British Medical Journal, November 2005
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (75th percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
275 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
400 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
connotea
1 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Cost effectiveness analysis of strategies for maternal and neonatal health in developing countries
Published in
British Medical Journal, November 2005
DOI 10.1136/bmj.331.7525.1107
Pubmed ID
Authors

Taghreed Adam, Stephen S Lim, Sumi Mehta, Zulfiqar A Bhutta, Helga Fogstad, Matthews Mathai, Jelka Zupan, Gary L Darmstadt

Abstract

To determine the costs and benefits of interventions for maternal and newborn health to assess the appropriateness of current strategies and guide future plans to attain the millennium development goals.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 400 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 5 1%
United Kingdom 5 1%
Canada 3 <1%
Kenya 2 <1%
South Africa 2 <1%
Spain 2 <1%
Colombia 2 <1%
Burundi 1 <1%
Indonesia 1 <1%
Other 7 2%
Unknown 370 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 100 25%
Researcher 69 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 45 11%
Student > Postgraduate 25 6%
Student > Bachelor 22 6%
Other 74 19%
Unknown 65 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 135 34%
Social Sciences 56 14%
Nursing and Health Professions 42 11%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 22 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 3%
Other 50 13%
Unknown 84 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 August 2022.
All research outputs
#2,201,916
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from British Medical Journal
#19,599
of 64,463 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,855
of 76,666 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Medical Journal
#56
of 240 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 64,463 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 45.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 76,666 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 240 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.