| Title |
Continuous venovenous hemofiltration versus extended daily hemofiltration in patients with septic acute kidney injury: a retrospective cohort study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Critical Care, April 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1186/cc13827 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Zhiping Sun, Hong Ye, Xia Shen, Hongdi Chao, Xiaochun Wu, Junwei Yang |
| Abstract |
Whether continuous venovenous hemofiltration (CVVHF) is superior to extended daily hemofiltration (EDHF) for the treatment of septic AKI is unknown. We compared the effect of CVVHF (greater than 72 hours) with EDHF (8 to 12 hours daily) on renal recovery and mortality in patients with severe sepsis or septic shock and concurrent acute kidney injury (AKI). |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 24 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 5 | 21% |
| Spain | 3 | 13% |
| Chile | 1 | 4% |
| United States | 1 | 4% |
| Italy | 1 | 4% |
| Ecuador | 1 | 4% |
| Greece | 1 | 4% |
| Sweden | 1 | 4% |
| Colombia | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 2 | 8% |
| Unknown | 7 | 29% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 12 | 50% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 6 | 25% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 4 | 17% |
| Scientists | 2 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 72 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Italy | 1 | 1% |
| Canada | 1 | 1% |
| Mexico | 1 | 1% |
| China | 1 | 1% |
| Spain | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 67 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 13 | 18% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 8 | 11% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 8 | 11% |
| Researcher | 6 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 7% |
| Other | 17 | 24% |
| Unknown | 15 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 39 | 54% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 6 | 8% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 4% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 3% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 4 | 6% |
| Unknown | 17 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 March 2015.
All research outputs
#2,373,246
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#2,071
of 6,554 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,602
of 241,350 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#19
of 163 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,554 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 241,350 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 163 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.