↓ Skip to main content

Impairment in face processing in autism spectrum disorder: a developmental perspective

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Neural Transmission, April 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
29 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
111 Mendeley
Title
Impairment in face processing in autism spectrum disorder: a developmental perspective
Published in
Journal of Neural Transmission, April 2014
DOI 10.1007/s00702-014-1206-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ellen Greimel, Martin Schulte-Rüther, Inge Kamp-Becker, Helmut Remschmidt, Beate Herpertz-Dahlmann, Kerstin Konrad

Abstract

Findings on face identity and facial emotion recognition in autism spectrum disorder (ASD) are inconclusive. Moreover, little is known about the developmental trajectory of face processing skills in ASD. Taking a developmental perspective, the aim of this study was to extend previous findings on face processing skills in a sample of adolescents and adults with ASD. N = 38 adolescents and adults (13-49 years) with high-functioning ASD and n = 37 typically developing (TD) control subjects matched for age and IQ participated in the study. Moreover, n = 18 TD children between the ages of 8 and 12 were included to address the question whether face processing skills in ASD follow a delayed developmental pattern. Face processing skills were assessed using computerized tasks of face identity recognition (FR) and identification of facial emotions (IFE). ASD subjects showed impaired performance on several parameters of the FR and IFE task compared to TD control adolescents and adults. Whereas TD adolescents and adults outperformed TD children in both tasks, performance in ASD adolescents and adults was similar to the group of TD children. Within the groups of ASD and control adolescents and adults, no age-related changes in performance were found. Our findings corroborate and extend previous studies showing that ASD is characterised by broad impairments in the ability to process faces. These impairments seem to reflect a developmentally delayed pattern that remains stable throughout adolescence and adulthood.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 111 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Unknown 106 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 15%
Researcher 16 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 15 14%
Student > Bachelor 14 13%
Student > Master 14 13%
Other 23 21%
Unknown 12 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 52 47%
Medicine and Dentistry 11 10%
Social Sciences 9 8%
Neuroscience 6 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 5%
Other 11 10%
Unknown 16 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 April 2014.
All research outputs
#17,489,487
of 25,654,806 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Neural Transmission
#1,315
of 1,868 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#135,976
of 224,890 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Neural Transmission
#8
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,654,806 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,868 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.9. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 224,890 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.