You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Guidelines for Evaluating Chronic Cough in Pediatrics ACCP Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
CHEST, January 2006
|
| DOI | 10.1378/chest.129.1_suppl.260s |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Anne B. Chang, William B. Glomb |
| Abstract |
To review relevant literature and present evidence-based guidelines to assist general and specialist medical practitioners in the evaluation and management of children who present with chronic cough. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Mexico | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 222 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Korea, Republic of | 2 | <1% |
| United States | 2 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Ecuador | 1 | <1% |
| Japan | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 214 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 31 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 23 | 10% |
| Researcher | 22 | 10% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 21 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 20 | 9% |
| Other | 69 | 31% |
| Unknown | 36 | 16% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 132 | 59% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 9 | 4% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 8 | 4% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 7 | 3% |
| Psychology | 5 | 2% |
| Other | 19 | 9% |
| Unknown | 42 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 November 2018.
All research outputs
#2,760,021
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from CHEST
#2,409
of 13,209 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,510
of 174,005 outputs
Outputs of similar age from CHEST
#13
of 73 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,209 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 174,005 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 73 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.