↓ Skip to main content

Disturbances, Their Interactions, and Cumulative Effects on Carbon and Charcoal Stocks in a Forested Ecosystem

Overview of attention for article published in Ecosystems, April 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
35 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
77 Mendeley
Title
Disturbances, Their Interactions, and Cumulative Effects on Carbon and Charcoal Stocks in a Forested Ecosystem
Published in
Ecosystems, April 2014
DOI 10.1007/s10021-014-9770-8
Authors

Brian Buma, Rebecca E. Poore, Carol A. Wessman

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 77 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 77 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 22%
Student > Master 16 21%
Researcher 12 16%
Student > Bachelor 7 9%
Other 5 6%
Other 13 17%
Unknown 7 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 31 40%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 22 29%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 5 6%
Unspecified 3 4%
Arts and Humanities 1 1%
Other 5 6%
Unknown 10 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 April 2014.
All research outputs
#19,086,307
of 23,650,645 outputs
Outputs from Ecosystems
#1,080
of 1,202 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#166,031
of 227,887 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ecosystems
#17
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,650,645 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,202 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.2. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 227,887 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.