↓ Skip to main content

Toxicity of differently sized and coated silver nanoparticles to the bacterium Pseudomonas putida: risks for the aquatic environment?

Overview of attention for article published in Ecotoxicology, March 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (61st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
peer_reviews
1 peer review site

Citations

dimensions_citation
48 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
69 Mendeley
Title
Toxicity of differently sized and coated silver nanoparticles to the bacterium Pseudomonas putida: risks for the aquatic environment?
Published in
Ecotoxicology, March 2014
DOI 10.1007/s10646-014-1222-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Marianne Matzke, Kerstin Jurkschat, Thomas Backhaus

Abstract

Aim of this study was to describe the toxicity of a set of different commercially available silver nanoparticles (AgNPs) to the gram-negative bacterium Pseudomonas putida (growth inhibition assay, ISO 10712) in order to contribute to their environmental hazard and risk assessment. Different AgNP sizes and coatings were selected in order to analyze whether those characteristics are determinants of nanoparticle toxicity. Silver nitrate was tested for comparison. In general Pseudomonas putida reacted very sensitive towards the exposure to silver, with an EC05 value of 0.043 μg L(-1) for AgNO3 and between 0.13 and 3.41 μg L(-1) for the different AgNPs (EC50 values 0.16 μg L(-1) for AgNO3, resp. between 0.25 and 13.4 μg L(-1) for AgNPs). As the ionic form of silver is clearly the most toxic, an environmental hazard assessment for microorganisms based on total silver concentration and the assumption that AgNPs dissolve is sufficiently protective. Neither specific coatings nor certain sizes could be linked to increasing or decreasing toxicity. The characterization of particle behavior as well as the total and dissolved silver content in the medium during the exposures was not possible due to the high sensitivity of Pseudomonas (test concentrations were below detection limits), indicating the need for further development in the analytical domain. Monitored silver concentrations in the aquatic environment span six orders of magnitude (0.1-120,000 ng L(-1)), which falls into the span of observed EC05 values and might hence indicate a risk to environmental bacteria.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 69 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Portugal 1 1%
Germany 1 1%
South Africa 1 1%
Canada 1 1%
Spain 1 1%
Poland 1 1%
Unknown 63 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 19 28%
Researcher 16 23%
Student > Master 10 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 9%
Student > Bachelor 5 7%
Other 8 12%
Unknown 5 7%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 19 28%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 13 19%
Chemistry 11 16%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 10%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 3 4%
Other 9 13%
Unknown 7 10%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 May 2021.
All research outputs
#14,194,875
of 22,753,345 outputs
Outputs from Ecotoxicology
#541
of 1,471 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#118,226
of 223,667 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ecotoxicology
#6
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,753,345 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,471 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 223,667 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.