| Title |
Identifying quality improvement intervention publications - A comparison of electronic search strategies
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Implementation Science, August 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1748-5908-6-85 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Susanne Hempel, Lisa V Rubenstein, Roberta M Shanman, Robbie Foy, Su Golder, Marjorie Danz, Paul G Shekelle |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 33% |
| Italy | 1 | 17% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 17% |
| Unknown | 2 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 50% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 33% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 17% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 73 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 1% |
| Rwanda | 1 | 1% |
| United States | 1 | 1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 69 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 16 | 22% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 10 | 14% |
| Librarian | 6 | 8% |
| Professor | 5 | 7% |
| Other | 15 | 21% |
| Unknown | 11 | 15% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 29 | 40% |
| Psychology | 7 | 10% |
| Social Sciences | 6 | 8% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 7% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 9 | 12% |
| Unknown | 14 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 May 2015.
All research outputs
#2,335,969
of 23,577,654 outputs
Outputs from Implementation Science
#512
of 1,728 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,277
of 121,228 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Implementation Science
#1
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,577,654 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,728 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 121,228 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.