↓ Skip to main content

Paradoxical mucocutaneous flare in a case of Behçet’s disease treated with tocilizumab

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Rheumatology, April 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
51 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
29 Mendeley
Title
Paradoxical mucocutaneous flare in a case of Behçet’s disease treated with tocilizumab
Published in
Clinical Rheumatology, April 2014
DOI 10.1007/s10067-014-2589-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Luca Cantarini, Giuseppe Lopalco, Antonio Vitale, Laura Coladonato, Donato Rigante, Orso Maria Lucherini, Giovanni Lapadula, Florenzo Iannone

Abstract

We report on a patient with a long-standing history of recurrent oral aphthosis and pseudofolliculitis, diagnosed with Behçet's disease (BD), previously treated with high-dose prednisone, colchicine, cyclosporine, cyclophosphamide and methotrexate, all of which were partially effective. Treatment with the chimeric mouse-human anti-tumour necrosis factor (TNF)-α monoclonal antibody infliximab brought about the resolution of mucocutaneous lesions for a period of 6 years. After an oral and articular BD relapse, the anti-interleukin-6 agent tocilizumab was started in association with high-dose prednisone. Unexpectedly, the patient experienced a paradoxical mucocutaneous flare following tocilizumab administration, which worsened after the second infusion. Tocilizumab was then discontinued, and total recovery was achieved after the patient was started on the fully human anti-TNF-α monoclonal antibody golimumab in association with colchicine and methylprednisolone.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 29 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 29 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 4 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 14%
Professor 2 7%
Student > Postgraduate 2 7%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 7%
Other 6 21%
Unknown 9 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 11 38%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 7%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 3%
Psychology 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 12 41%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 April 2014.
All research outputs
#18,370,767
of 22,753,345 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Rheumatology
#2,309
of 2,988 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#164,172
of 226,666 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Rheumatology
#51
of 65 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,753,345 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,988 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.9. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 226,666 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 65 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.