↓ Skip to main content

Erratum to: A Comparison of the Pedagogical Practices of Mathematics Education for Young Children in England and South Korea

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, April 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
Title
Erratum to: A Comparison of the Pedagogical Practices of Mathematics Education for Young Children in England and South Korea
Published in
International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, April 2014
DOI 10.1007/s10763-014-9529-x
Authors

Iram Siraj-Blatchford, Kwi-Ok Nah

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1 Mendeley reader of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 1 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Lecturer 1 100%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Mathematics 1 100%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 April 2014.
All research outputs
#19,383,782
of 23,857,313 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education
#700
of 894 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#150,661
of 206,421 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education
#22
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,857,313 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 894 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.6. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 206,421 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.