| Title |
Identifying lynx and other North American felids based on MtDNA analysis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Conservation Genetics, September 2000
|
| DOI | 10.1023/a:1011574209558 |
| Authors |
L. Scott Mills, Kristine L. Pilgrim, Michael K. Schwartz, Kevin McKelvey |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 241 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 6 | 2% |
| India | 3 | 1% |
| Italy | 2 | <1% |
| United States | 2 | <1% |
| Czechia | 2 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
| Colombia | 1 | <1% |
| Turkey | 1 | <1% |
| United Arab Emirates | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 6 | 2% |
| Unknown | 215 | 89% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 53 | 22% |
| Student > Master | 46 | 19% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 35 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 20 | 8% |
| Other | 14 | 6% |
| Other | 37 | 15% |
| Unknown | 36 | 15% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 147 | 61% |
| Environmental Science | 40 | 17% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 7 | 3% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 3 | 1% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 2 | <1% |
| Other | 4 | 2% |
| Unknown | 38 | 16% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 April 2014.
All research outputs
#4,835,823
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Conservation Genetics
#271
of 1,144 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,698
of 37,745 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Conservation Genetics
#1
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,144 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 37,745 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them