↓ Skip to main content

A missed opportunity – consequences of unknown levetiracepam pharmacokinetics in a peritoneal dialysis patient

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Nephrology, April 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
40 Mendeley
Title
A missed opportunity – consequences of unknown levetiracepam pharmacokinetics in a peritoneal dialysis patient
Published in
BMC Nephrology, April 2014
DOI 10.1186/1471-2369-15-49
Pubmed ID
Authors

Svenja K Bahte, Marcus Hiss, Ralf Lichtinghagen, Jan T Kielstein

Abstract

Levetiracetam is a frequently used drug in the therapy of partial onset, myoclonic and generalized tonic-clonic seizures. The main route of elimination is via the kidneys, which eliminate 66% of the unchanged drug as well as 24% as inactive metabolite that stems from enzymatic hydrolysis. Therefore dose adjustments are needed in patients with chronic kidney disease stage 5 D, i.e. patients undergoing dialysis treatment. In this patient population a dose reduction by 50% is recommended, so that patients receive 250-750 mg every 12 hours. However "dialysis" can be performed in using different modalities and treatment intensities. For most of the drugs pharmacokinetic data and dosing recommendations for patients undergoing peritoneal dialysis are not available. This is the first report on levetiracetam pharmacokinetics in a peritoneal dialysis patient.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 40 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 40 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 7 18%
Student > Bachelor 6 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 10%
Other 3 8%
Student > Master 3 8%
Other 4 10%
Unknown 13 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 16 40%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 8%
Computer Science 1 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 3%
Other 2 5%
Unknown 13 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 April 2014.
All research outputs
#14,194,875
of 22,753,345 outputs
Outputs from BMC Nephrology
#1,205
of 2,461 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#107,726
of 203,744 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Nephrology
#19
of 43 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,753,345 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,461 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 203,744 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 43 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.