↓ Skip to main content

Species distribution models applied to plant species selection in forest restoration: are model predictions comparable to expert opinion?

Overview of attention for article published in New Forests, April 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
7 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
35 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
113 Mendeley
Title
Species distribution models applied to plant species selection in forest restoration: are model predictions comparable to expert opinion?
Published in
New Forests, April 2014
DOI 10.1007/s11056-014-9427-7
Authors

Aitor Gastón, Juan I. García-Viñas, Alfredo J. Bravo-Fernández, César López-Leiva, Juan A. Oliet, Sonia Roig, Rafael Serrada

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 113 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 2 2%
Mexico 1 <1%
Unknown 110 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 22 19%
Researcher 21 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 12%
Student > Bachelor 11 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 8%
Other 12 11%
Unknown 25 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 45 40%
Environmental Science 28 25%
Computer Science 3 3%
Engineering 2 2%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 2%
Other 3 3%
Unknown 30 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 November 2016.
All research outputs
#7,443,306
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from New Forests
#56
of 292 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#67,150
of 245,534 outputs
Outputs of similar age from New Forests
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 292 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 245,534 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them