You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Results of the Brazilian Osteosarcoma Treatment Group Studies III and IV: Prognostic Factors and Impact on Survival
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Clinical Oncology, March 2006
|
| DOI | 10.1200/jco.2005.03.5352 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
A. Sérgio Petrilli, Beatriz de Camargo, Vicente Odone Filho, Paula Bruniera, Algemir L. Brunetto, Reynaldo Jesus-Garcia, Olavo P. Camargo, Walter Pena, Pedro Péricles, Alexandre Davi, José D. Prospero, Maria Teresa S. Alves, Claudia R. Oliveira, Carla R.D. Macedo, Wellington L. Mendes, Maria Teresa A. Almeida, Maria L. Borsato, Telma M. dos Santos, Jorge Ortega, Elio Consentino |
| Abstract |
To evaluate the impact of chemotherapy and surgery on the outcome of osteosarcoma (OS) of the extremities and to identify prognostic factors in Brazilian patients. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 97 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 2 | 2% |
| Ecuador | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 94 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 17 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 15 | 15% |
| Researcher | 12 | 12% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 11 | 11% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 8 | 8% |
| Other | 18 | 19% |
| Unknown | 16 | 16% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 52 | 54% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 4% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 4% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 4% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 11 | 11% |
| Unknown | 19 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 April 2006.
All research outputs
#15,233,109
of 22,649,029 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Clinical Oncology
#16,656
of 19,837 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#63,772
of 71,789 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Clinical Oncology
#106
of 114 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,649,029 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 19,837 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.2. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 71,789 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 114 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.