↓ Skip to main content

Re-visiting Hypersensitivity Reactions to Taxanes: A Comprehensive Review

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Reviews in Allergy & Immunology, April 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#28 of 690)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
3 news outlets
policy
1 policy source
twitter
7 X users
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
123 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
139 Mendeley
Title
Re-visiting Hypersensitivity Reactions to Taxanes: A Comprehensive Review
Published in
Clinical Reviews in Allergy & Immunology, April 2014
DOI 10.1007/s12016-014-8416-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Matthieu Picard, Mariana C. Castells

Abstract

Taxanes (a class of chemotherapeutic agents) are an important cause of hypersensitivity reactions (HSRs) in cancer patients. During the last decade, the development of rapid drug desensitization has been key to allow patients with HSRs to taxanes to be safely re-treated although the mechanisms of these HSRs are not fully understood. Earlier studies suggested that solvents, such as Cremophor EL used to solubilize paclitaxel, were responsible for HSRs through complement activation, but recent findings have raised the possibility that some of these HSRs are IgE-mediated. Taxane skin testing, which identifies patients with an IgE-mediated sensitivity, appears as a promising diagnostic and risk stratification tool in the management of patients with HSRs to taxanes. The management of patients following a HSR involves risk stratification and re-exposure could be performed either through rapid drug desensitization or graded challenge based on the severity of the initial HSR and the skin test result. Rapid drug desensitization has been shown to be an effective and safe method to re-introduce taxanes in hundreds of patients, including those with life-threatening HSRs. Patients with non-severe delayed skin HSRs may benefit from rapid drug desensitization since they may be at increased risk for an immediate HSR upon re-exposure. This review focuses on the clinical presentation, diagnosis, and novel mechanisms of immediate HSRs to taxanes. A new management strategy for HSRs to taxanes based on skin testing and rapid drug desensitization is proposed.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 139 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 138 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 21 15%
Researcher 13 9%
Student > Bachelor 13 9%
Student > Postgraduate 12 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 9%
Other 29 21%
Unknown 39 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 45 32%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 18 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 2%
Other 12 9%
Unknown 51 37%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 32. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 October 2020.
All research outputs
#1,132,211
of 23,975,976 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Reviews in Allergy & Immunology
#28
of 690 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,406
of 229,528 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Reviews in Allergy & Immunology
#1
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,975,976 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 690 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 229,528 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.