| Title |
Intrusive thoughts and images of intentional harm to infants in the context of maternal postnatal depression, anxiety, and OCD
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
British Journal of General Practice, July 2017
|
| DOI | 10.3399/bjgp17x692105 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Peter J Lawrence, Michelle G Craske, Claire Kempton, Anne Stewart, Alan Stein |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 27 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 15 | 56% |
| South Africa | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 11 | 41% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 18 | 67% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 6 | 22% |
| Scientists | 3 | 11% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 105 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 105 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 13 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 8% |
| Researcher | 7 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 7% |
| Other | 6 | 6% |
| Other | 21 | 20% |
| Unknown | 43 | 41% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 20 | 19% |
| Psychology | 17 | 16% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 9 | 9% |
| Social Sciences | 5 | 5% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 8 | 8% |
| Unknown | 44 | 42% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 54. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 January 2024.
All research outputs
#802,684
of 25,753,578 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of General Practice
#344
of 4,935 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,312
of 328,284 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of General Practice
#17
of 91 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,753,578 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,935 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 328,284 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 91 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.