↓ Skip to main content

Improving recognition of anxiety and depression in rheumatoid arthritis: a qualitative study in a community clinic

Overview of attention for article published in British Journal of General Practice, July 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (65th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
twitter
7 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
21 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
130 Mendeley
Title
Improving recognition of anxiety and depression in rheumatoid arthritis: a qualitative study in a community clinic
Published in
British Journal of General Practice, July 2017
DOI 10.3399/bjgp17x691877
Pubmed ID
Authors

Annabelle Machin, Samantha Hider, Nicky Dale, Carolyn Chew-Graham

Abstract

Comorbid anxiety and depression are common in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) but are often under-recognised and treated, contributing to worse outcomes. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) recommends that patients with RA should be offered a holistic annual review, including an assessment of mood. To explore patients' perspectives of anxiety and depression in RA and preferences for disclosure and management of mood problems. Qualitative interview study with patients recruited from a nurse-led RA annual review clinic in the Midlands, England. Patients attending the clinic who scored ≥3 on the case-finding questions (PHQ-2 and GAD-2) were invited for interview. Data were analysed thematically using principles of constant comparison. Participants recognised a connection between their RA and mood, though this was perceived variably. Some lacked candidacy for care, normalising their mood problems. Fear of stigmatisation, a lack of time, and the perception that clinicians prioritise physical over mental health problems recursively affected help-seeking. Good communication and continuity of care were perceived to be integral to disclosure of mood problems. Participants expressed a preference for psychological therapies, though they reported problems accessing care. Some perceived medication to be offered as a 'quick fix' and feared potential drug interactions. Prior experiences can lead patients with RA and comorbid anxiety and depression to feel they lack candidacy for care. Provision of equal priority to mental and physical health problems by GPs and improved continuity of care could help disclosure of mood concerns. Facilitation of access to psychological therapies could improve outcomes for both mental and physical health problems.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 130 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 130 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 29 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 9%
Student > Master 11 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 6%
Researcher 8 6%
Other 19 15%
Unknown 43 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 32 25%
Psychology 18 14%
Nursing and Health Professions 17 13%
Social Sciences 5 4%
Business, Management and Accounting 3 2%
Other 9 7%
Unknown 46 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 March 2022.
All research outputs
#1,627,951
of 23,460,553 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of General Practice
#814
of 4,374 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#30,854
of 284,306 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of General Practice
#32
of 94 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,460,553 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,374 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 284,306 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 94 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.