↓ Skip to main content

Bidirectional Associations Between Parental Warmth, Callous Unemotional Behavior, and Behavior Problems in High-Risk Preschoolers

Overview of attention for article published in Research on Child and Adolescent Psychopathology, April 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
122 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
183 Mendeley
Title
Bidirectional Associations Between Parental Warmth, Callous Unemotional Behavior, and Behavior Problems in High-Risk Preschoolers
Published in
Research on Child and Adolescent Psychopathology, April 2014
DOI 10.1007/s10802-014-9871-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Rebecca Waller, Frances Gardner, Essi Viding, Daniel S. Shaw, Thomas J. Dishion, Melvin N. Wilson, Luke W. Hyde

Abstract

Research suggests that parental warmth and positive parent-child interactions predict the development of conscience and empathy. Recent studies suggest that affective dimensions of parenting, including parental warmth, are associated with fewer behavior problems among children with high levels of callous-unemotional (CU) behavior. Evidence also suggests that CU behavior confers risk for behavior problems by uniquely shaping parenting. The current study examines reciprocal associations between parental warmth, CU behavior, and behavior problems among toddlers. Data from mother-child dyads (N = 731; 49 % female) were collected from a multi-ethnic, high-risk sample at ages 2 and 3. CU behavior was assessed using a previously validated measure (Hyde et al. 2013). Models were tested using two measures of parental warmth, the first from direct observations of warmth in the home, the second coded from 5-min speech samples. Three-way cross-lagged, simultaneous effects models showed that parental warmth predicted child CU behavior, over and above associations with behavior problems. There were cross-lagged associations between directly observed parental warmth and child CU behavior, suggesting these behaviors show some malleability during toddlerhood and that parenting appears to reflect some adaptation to child behavior. The results have implications for models of early-starting behavior problems and preventative interventions for young children.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 183 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Unknown 178 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 35 19%
Researcher 27 15%
Student > Master 27 15%
Student > Bachelor 24 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 5%
Other 34 19%
Unknown 27 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 110 60%
Medicine and Dentistry 15 8%
Social Sciences 8 4%
Neuroscience 6 3%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 2%
Other 8 4%
Unknown 33 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 November 2014.
All research outputs
#20,657,128
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Research on Child and Adolescent Psychopathology
#1,848
of 2,047 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#175,337
of 238,623 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Research on Child and Adolescent Psychopathology
#19
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,047 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.5. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 238,623 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.