↓ Skip to main content

Motion and pattern cortical potentials in adults with high-functioning autism spectrum disorder

Overview of attention for article published in Documenta Ophthalmologica, August 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#9 of 456)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
17 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
44 Mendeley
Title
Motion and pattern cortical potentials in adults with high-functioning autism spectrum disorder
Published in
Documenta Ophthalmologica, August 2012
DOI 10.1007/s10633-012-9349-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Paul A. Constable, Sebastian B. Gaigg, Dermot M. Bowler, Dorothy A. Thompson

Abstract

PURPOSE: Autism spectrum disorder (ASD) is a condition in which visual perception to both static and moving stimuli is altered. The aim of this study was to investigate the early cortical responses of subjects with ASD to simple patterns and moving radial rings using visual evoked potentials (VEPs). METHODS: Male ASD participants (n = 9) and typically developing (TD) individuals (n = 7) were matched for full, performance and verbal IQ (p > 0.263). VEPs were recorded to the pattern reversing checks of 50' side length presented with Michelson contrasts of 98 and 10 % and to the onset of motion-either expansion or contraction of low-contrast concentric rings (33.3 % duty cycle at 10 % contrast). RESULTS: There were no significant differences between groups in the VEPs elicited by pattern reversal checkerboards of high (98 %) or low (10 %) contrast. The ASD group had a significantly larger N160 peak (1.85 x) amplitude to motion onset VEPs elicited by the expansion of radial rings (p = 0.001). No differences were evident in contraction VEP peak amplitudes nor in the latencies of the motion onset N160 peaks. There was no evidence of a response that could be associated with adaptation to the motion stimulus in the interstimulus interval following an expansion or contraction phase of the rings. CONCLUSION: These data support a difference in processing of motion onset stimuli in this adult high-functioning ASD group compared to the TD group.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 44 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 1 2%
Australia 1 2%
Unknown 42 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 23%
Researcher 9 20%
Student > Bachelor 5 11%
Student > Master 5 11%
Professor 3 7%
Other 5 11%
Unknown 7 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 13 30%
Medicine and Dentistry 9 20%
Neuroscience 4 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 7%
Other 3 7%
Unknown 8 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 October 2014.
All research outputs
#2,765,773
of 22,754,104 outputs
Outputs from Documenta Ophthalmologica
#9
of 456 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,231
of 169,461 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Documenta Ophthalmologica
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,754,104 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 456 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 169,461 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them