↓ Skip to main content

The Perinatal Anxiety Screening Scale: development and preliminary validation

Overview of attention for article published in Archives of Women's Mental Health, April 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
173 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
511 Mendeley
Title
The Perinatal Anxiety Screening Scale: development and preliminary validation
Published in
Archives of Women's Mental Health, April 2014
DOI 10.1007/s00737-014-0425-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Susanne Somerville, Kellie Dedman, Rosemary Hagan, Elizabeth Oxnam, Michelle Wettinger, Shannon Byrne, Soledad Coo, Dorota Doherty, Andrew C. Page

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to develop a scale (Perinatal Anxiety Screening Scale, PASS) to screen for a broad range of problematic anxiety symptoms which is sensitive to how anxiety presents in perinatal women and is suitable to use in a variety of settings including antenatal clinics, inpatient and outpatient hospital and mental health treatment settings. Women who attended a tertiary obstetric hospital in the state of Western Australia antenatally or postpartum (n = 437) completed the PASS and other commonly used measures of depression and anxiety. Factor analysis was used to examine factor structure, and ROC analysis was used to evaluate performance as a screening tool. The PASS was significantly correlated with other measures of depression and anxiety. Principal component analyses (PCA) suggested a four-factor structure addressing symptoms of (1) acute anxiety and adjustment, (2) general worry and specific fears, (3) perfectionism, control and trauma and (4) social anxiety. The four subscales and total scale demonstrated high to excellent reliabilities. At the optimal cutoff score for detecting anxiety as determined by ROC analyses, the PASS identified 68 % of women with a diagnosed anxiety disorder. This was compared to the EPDS anxiety subscale which detected 36 % of anxiety disorders. The PASS is an acceptable, valid and useful screening tool for the identification of risk of significant anxiety in women in the perinatal period.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 511 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Unknown 509 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 72 14%
Student > Master 53 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 28 5%
Researcher 26 5%
Lecturer 21 4%
Other 74 14%
Unknown 237 46%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 71 14%
Nursing and Health Professions 70 14%
Psychology 68 13%
Social Sciences 13 3%
Engineering 6 1%
Other 37 7%
Unknown 246 48%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 April 2014.
All research outputs
#15,299,919
of 22,754,104 outputs
Outputs from Archives of Women's Mental Health
#698
of 920 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#133,005
of 226,135 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Archives of Women's Mental Health
#8
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,754,104 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 920 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.3. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 226,135 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.