↓ Skip to main content

Epidemiological Paradox or Immigrant Vulnerability? Obesity Among Young Children of Immigrants

Overview of attention for article published in Demography, June 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (55th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
38 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
76 Mendeley
Title
Epidemiological Paradox or Immigrant Vulnerability? Obesity Among Young Children of Immigrants
Published in
Demography, June 2015
DOI 10.1007/s13524-015-0404-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Elizabeth H. Baker, Michael S. Rendall, Margaret M. Weden

Abstract

According to the "immigrant epidemiological paradox," immigrants and their children enjoy health advantages over their U.S.-born peers-advantages that diminish with greater acculturation. We investigated child obesity as a potentially significant deviation from this paradox for second-generation immigrant children. We evaluated two alternate measures of mother's acculturation: age at arrival in the United States and English language proficiency. To obtain sufficient numbers of second-generation immigrant children, we pooled samples across two related, nationally representative surveys. Each included measured (not parent-reported) height and weight of kindergartners. We also estimated models that alternately included and excluded mother's pre-pregnancy weight status as a predictor. Our findings are opposite to those predicted by the immigrant epidemiological paradox: children of U.S.-born mothers were less likely to be obese than otherwise similar children of foreign-born mothers; and the children of the least-acculturated immigrant mothers, as measured by low English language proficiency, were the most likely to be obese. Foreign-born mothers had lower (healthier) pre-pregnancy weight than U.S.-born mothers, and this was protective against their second-generation children's obesity. This protection, however, was not sufficiently strong to outweigh factors associated or correlated with the mothers' linguistic isolation and marginal status as immigrants.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 76 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 76 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 20 26%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 14%
Researcher 9 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 11%
Student > Bachelor 5 7%
Other 12 16%
Unknown 11 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 22 29%
Medicine and Dentistry 18 24%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 11%
Psychology 4 5%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 2 3%
Other 4 5%
Unknown 18 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 August 2015.
All research outputs
#13,603,559
of 24,119,703 outputs
Outputs from Demography
#1,774
of 1,984 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#117,686
of 267,656 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Demography
#17
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,119,703 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,984 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.7. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 267,656 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.