You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Function in Patients With Cervical Radiculopathy or Chronic Whiplash-Associated Disorders Compared With Healthy Volunteers
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Manipulative & Physiological Therapeutics, April 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.jmpt.2014.01.003 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Anneli Peolsson, Maria Landén Ludvigsson, Johanna Wibault, Åsa Dedering, Gunnel Peterson |
| Abstract |
The purposes of this study were to examine whether any differences in function and health exist between patients with cervical radiculopathy (CR) due to disk disease scheduled for surgery and patients with chronic whiplash-associated disorders (WADs) and to compare measures of patients' physical function with those obtained from healthy volunteers. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 2 | 50% |
| United States | 1 | 25% |
| France | 1 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 50% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 25% |
| Scientists | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 122 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 120 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 18 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 18 | 15% |
| Researcher | 10 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 6% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 6 | 5% |
| Other | 19 | 16% |
| Unknown | 44 | 36% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 30 | 25% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 26 | 21% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 3% |
| Neuroscience | 4 | 3% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 10 | 8% |
| Unknown | 45 | 37% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 May 2014.
All research outputs
#14,615,224
of 25,394,764 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Manipulative & Physiological Therapeutics
#719
of 1,381 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#117,696
of 241,124 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Manipulative & Physiological Therapeutics
#11
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,394,764 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,381 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.0. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 241,124 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.