| Title |
Implant Breast Reconstruction and Radiation: A Multicenter Analysis of Long-Term Health-Related Quality of Life and Satisfaction
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Annals of Surgical Oncology, April 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1245/s10434-014-3483-2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Claudia R. Albornoz, Evan Matros, Colleen M. McCarthy, Anne Klassen, Stefan J. Cano, Amy K. Alderman, Nancy VanLaeken, Peter Lennox, Sheina A. Macadam, Joseph J. Disa, Babak J. Mehrara, Peter G. Cordeiro, Andrea L. Pusic |
| Abstract |
Indications for radiotherapy in breast cancer treatment are expanding. Long-term satisfaction and health-related quality of life (HR-QOL), important outcomes after alloplastic breast reconstruction and radiation, have not been measured in irradiated patients by using a condition-specific, validated patient-reported outcomes instrument. The aim was to evaluate patient satisfaction and HR-QOL in patients with implant breast reconstruction and radiotherapy. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 50% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 1 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 2 | 50% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 25% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 113 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 112 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 21 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 16 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 10% |
| Other | 10 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 10 | 9% |
| Other | 24 | 21% |
| Unknown | 21 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 54 | 48% |
| Psychology | 10 | 9% |
| Unspecified | 6 | 5% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 5% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 10 | 9% |
| Unknown | 24 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 July 2014.
All research outputs
#13,408,116
of 22,754,104 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Surgical Oncology
#3,802
of 6,445 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#111,880
of 226,765 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Surgical Oncology
#38
of 93 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,754,104 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,445 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 226,765 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 93 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.