| Title |
The prognosis for individuals on disability retirement An 18-year mortality follow-up study of 6887 men and women sampled from the general population
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Public Health, April 2006
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2458-6-103 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Thorne Wallman, Hans Wedel, Saga Johansson, Annika Rosengren, Henry Eriksson, Lennart Welin, Kurt Svärdsudd |
| Abstract |
Several studies have shown a markedly higher mortality rate among disability pensioners than among non-retired. Since most disability pensions are granted because of non-fatal diseases the reason for the increased mortality therefore remains largely unknown. The aim of this study was to evaluate potential explanatory factors. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 38 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 37 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 13 | 34% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 11% |
| Other | 3 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 6 | 16% |
| Unknown | 5 | 13% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 11 | 29% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 8 | 21% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 11% |
| Psychology | 4 | 11% |
| Sports and Recreations | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 2 | 5% |
| Unknown | 7 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 November 2023.
All research outputs
#16,361,397
of 25,830,005 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#12,459
of 17,865 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#75,328
of 85,380 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#37
of 42 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,830,005 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 17,865 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.5. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 85,380 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 42 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.