↓ Skip to main content

Screening for Autistic Spectrum Disorder in Children Aged 14–15 Months. II: Population Screening with the Early Screening of Autistic Traits Questionnaire (ESAT). Design and General Findings

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, April 2006
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (66th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
f1000
1 research highlight platform

Citations

dimensions_citation
198 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
159 Mendeley
Title
Screening for Autistic Spectrum Disorder in Children Aged 14–15 Months. II: Population Screening with the Early Screening of Autistic Traits Questionnaire (ESAT). Design and General Findings
Published in
Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, April 2006
DOI 10.1007/s10803-006-0114-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Claudine Dietz, Sophie Swinkels, Emma van Daalen, Herman van Engeland, Jan K. Buitelaar

Abstract

A two-stage protocol for screening for autistic spectrum disorders (ASD) was evaluated in a random population of 31,724 children aged 14-15 months. Children were first pre-screened by physicians at well-baby clinics using a 4-item screening instrument. Infants that screened positive were then evaluated during a 1.5-h home visit by a trained psychologist using a recently developed screening instrument, the 14-item Early Screening of Autistic Traits Questionnaire (ESAT). Children with 3 or more negative scores were considered to be at high-risk of developing ASD and were invited for further systematic psychiatric examination. Eighteen children with ASD were identified. The group of children with false positive results had related disorders, such as Language Disorder (N = 18) and Mental Retardation (N = 13).

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 159 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 7 4%
Korea, Republic of 2 1%
Canada 2 1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Unknown 146 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 32 20%
Researcher 23 14%
Student > Master 22 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 14 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 11 7%
Other 31 19%
Unknown 26 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 63 40%
Medicine and Dentistry 23 14%
Social Sciences 15 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 4%
Computer Science 7 4%
Other 18 11%
Unknown 26 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 September 2023.
All research outputs
#7,029,502
of 24,464,848 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
#2,560
of 5,346 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,624
of 68,768 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
#16
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,464,848 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,346 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 68,768 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.