↓ Skip to main content

Effect of Lactobacillus salivarius Bacteriocin Abp118 on the Mouse and Pig Intestinal Microbiota

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, February 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
134 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
226 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Effect of Lactobacillus salivarius Bacteriocin Abp118 on the Mouse and Pig Intestinal Microbiota
Published in
PLOS ONE, February 2012
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0031113
Pubmed ID
Authors

Eliette Riboulet-Bisson, Mark H. J. Sturme, Ian B. Jeffery, Michelle M. O'Donnell, B. Anne Neville, Brian M. Forde, Marcus J. Claesson, Hugh Harris, Gillian E. Gardiner, Patrick G. Casey, Peadar G. Lawlor, Paul W. O'Toole, R. Paul Ross

Abstract

Lactobacilli are gram-positive bacteria that are a subdominant element in the human gastrointestinal microbiota, and which are commonly used in the food industry. Some lactobacilli are considered probiotic, and have been associated with health benefits. However, there is very little culture-independent information on how consumed probiotic microorganisms might affect the entire intestinal microbiota. We therefore studied the impact of the administration of Lactobacillus salivarius UCC118, a microorganism well characterized for its probiotic properties, on the composition of the intestinal microbiota in two model animals. UCC118 has anti-infective activity due to production of the bacteriocin Abp118, a broad-spectrum class IIb bacteriocin, which we hypothesized could impact the microbiota. Mice and pigs were administered wild-type (WT) L. salivarius UCC118 cells, or a mutant lacking bacteriocin production. The microbiota composition was determined by pyrosequencing of 16S rRNA gene amplicons from faeces. The data show that L. salivarius UCC118 administration had no significant effect on proportions of major phyla comprising the mouse microbiota, whether the strain was producing bacteriocin or not. However, L. salivarius UCC118 WT administration led to a significant decrease in Spirochaetes levels, the third major phylum in the untreated pig microbiota. In both pigs and mice, L. salivarius UCC118 administration had an effect on Firmicutes genus members. This effect was not observed when the mutant strain was administered, and was thus associated with bacteriocin production. Surprisingly, in both models, L. salivarius UCC118 administration and production of Abp118 had an effect on gram-negative microorganisms, even though Abp118 is normally not active in vitro against this group of microorganisms. Thus L. salivarius UCC118 administration has a significant but subtle impact on mouse and pig microbiota, by a mechanism that seems at least partially bacteriocin-dependent.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 226 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 6 3%
Ireland 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Kazakhstan 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Czechia 1 <1%
Greece 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 212 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 43 19%
Researcher 41 18%
Student > Bachelor 25 11%
Student > Master 24 11%
Other 12 5%
Other 33 15%
Unknown 48 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 94 42%
Immunology and Microbiology 26 12%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 19 8%
Medicine and Dentistry 12 5%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 5 2%
Other 17 8%
Unknown 53 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 April 2014.
All research outputs
#18,371,293
of 22,754,104 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#154,399
of 194,175 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#121,750
of 156,303 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#2,667
of 3,606 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,754,104 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 194,175 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.1. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 156,303 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3,606 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.