You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Aggravating and mitigating factors associated with cyclist injury severity in Denmark
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Safety Research, April 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.jsr.2014.03.012 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Sigal Kaplan, Konstantinos Vavatsoulas, Carlo Giacomo Prato |
| Abstract |
Denmark is one of the leading cycling nations, where cycling trips constitute a large share of the total trips, and cycling safety assumes a top priority position in the agenda of policy makers. The current study sheds light on the aggravating and mitigating factors associated with cyclist injury severity on Danish roads by examining a comprehensive set of accidents involving a cyclist and a collision partner between 2007 and 2011. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 3 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 198 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Norway | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Japan | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 193 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 40 | 20% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 26 | 13% |
| Researcher | 22 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 16 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 12 | 6% |
| Other | 35 | 18% |
| Unknown | 47 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 49 | 25% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 23 | 12% |
| Social Sciences | 17 | 9% |
| Environmental Science | 12 | 6% |
| Psychology | 8 | 4% |
| Other | 30 | 15% |
| Unknown | 59 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 April 2014.
All research outputs
#15,517,312
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Safety Research
#754
of 999 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#126,550
of 241,054 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Safety Research
#4
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 999 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.1. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 241,054 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.