| Title |
Comparison of laparoscopic and open ileocecal resection for Crohn’s disease: a metaanalysis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Surgical Endoscopy, May 2006
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00464-005-0500-3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
H. S. Tilney, V. A. Constantinides, A. G. Heriot, M. Nicolaou, T. Athanasiou, P. Ziprin, A. W. Darzi, P. P. Tekkis |
| Abstract |
The role of laparoscopic surgery for patients with ileocecal Crohn's disease is a contentious issue. This metaanalysis aimed to compare open resection with laparoscopically assisted resection for ileocecal Crohn's disease. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 74 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 1% |
| Brazil | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 72 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 11 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 11% |
| Other | 7 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 9% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 6 | 8% |
| Other | 20 | 27% |
| Unknown | 15 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 44 | 59% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 1% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 1% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 1 | 1% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 3 | 4% |
| Unknown | 23 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 June 2006.
All research outputs
#17,932,284
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Surgical Endoscopy
#4,312
of 7,048 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#79,477
of 88,775 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Surgical Endoscopy
#10
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,048 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 88,775 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.