↓ Skip to main content

Genomic imprinting in development, growth, behavior and stem cells

Overview of attention for article published in Development (09501991), April 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
3 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
198 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
263 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Genomic imprinting in development, growth, behavior and stem cells
Published in
Development (09501991), April 2014
DOI 10.1242/dev.101428
Pubmed ID
Authors

Robert N. Plasschaert, Marisa S. Bartolomei

Abstract

Genes that are subject to genomic imprinting in mammals are preferentially expressed from a single parental allele. This imprinted expression of a small number of genes is crucial for normal development, as these genes often directly regulate fetal growth. Recent work has also demonstrated intricate roles for imprinted genes in the brain, with important consequences on behavior and neuronal function. Finally, new studies have revealed the importance of proper expression of specific imprinted genes in induced pluripotent stem cells and in adult stem cells. As we review here, these findings highlight the complex nature and developmental importance of imprinted genes.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 263 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 5 2%
United Kingdom 3 1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
China 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 251 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 71 27%
Researcher 35 13%
Student > Master 35 13%
Student > Bachelor 33 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 13 5%
Other 34 13%
Unknown 42 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 91 35%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 87 33%
Medicine and Dentistry 16 6%
Neuroscience 5 2%
Environmental Science 3 1%
Other 10 4%
Unknown 51 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 November 2014.
All research outputs
#2,861,998
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Development (09501991)
#1,579
of 9,469 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,113
of 241,520 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Development (09501991)
#14
of 73 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,469 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 241,520 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 73 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.