You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Pulse oximetry with clinical assessment to screen for congenital heart disease in neonates in China: a prospective study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
The Lancet, April 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1016/s0140-6736(14)60198-7 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Qu-ming Zhao, Xiao-jing Ma, Xiao-ling Ge, Fang Liu, Wei-li Yan, Lin Wu, Ming Ye, Xue-cun Liang, Jing Zhang, Yan Gao, Bing Jia, Guo-ying Huang, the Neonatal Congenital Heart Disease screening group |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Argentina | 1 | 8% |
| Canada | 1 | 8% |
| Germany | 1 | 8% |
| United States | 1 | 8% |
| Ecuador | 1 | 8% |
| Australia | 1 | 8% |
| Russia | 1 | 8% |
| Peru | 1 | 8% |
| United Arab Emirates | 1 | 8% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 3 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 9 | 75% |
| Scientists | 2 | 17% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 173 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Mexico | 1 | <1% |
| Colombia | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 169 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 29 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 27 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 26 | 15% |
| Other | 14 | 8% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 10 | 6% |
| Other | 32 | 18% |
| Unknown | 35 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 78 | 45% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 11 | 6% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 7 | 4% |
| Computer Science | 5 | 3% |
| Social Sciences | 4 | 2% |
| Other | 22 | 13% |
| Unknown | 46 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 43. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 April 2020.
All research outputs
#983,110
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from The Lancet
#7,630
of 43,155 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,284
of 245,474 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Lancet
#94
of 437 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 43,155 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 67.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 245,474 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 437 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.