↓ Skip to main content

Pulse oximetry with clinical assessment to screen for congenital heart disease in neonates in China: a prospective study

Overview of attention for article published in The Lancet, April 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (78th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
3 blogs
twitter
12 X users
weibo
3 weibo users
facebook
2 Facebook pages
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
185 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
174 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Pulse oximetry with clinical assessment to screen for congenital heart disease in neonates in China: a prospective study
Published in
The Lancet, April 2014
DOI 10.1016/s0140-6736(14)60198-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Qu-ming Zhao, Xiao-jing Ma, Xiao-ling Ge, Fang Liu, Wei-li Yan, Lin Wu, Ming Ye, Xue-cun Liang, Jing Zhang, Yan Gao, Bing Jia, Guo-ying Huang, the Neonatal Congenital Heart Disease screening group

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 174 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Unknown 170 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 29 17%
Student > Bachelor 27 16%
Student > Master 25 14%
Other 14 8%
Professor > Associate Professor 10 6%
Other 35 20%
Unknown 34 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 81 47%
Nursing and Health Professions 10 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 4%
Computer Science 5 3%
Social Sciences 4 2%
Other 22 13%
Unknown 45 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 43. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 April 2020.
All research outputs
#963,361
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from The Lancet
#7,538
of 42,671 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,186
of 241,514 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Lancet
#95
of 437 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 42,671 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 67.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 241,514 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 437 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.