↓ Skip to main content

Defensive Medicine, Cost Containment, and Reform

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of General Internal Medicine, February 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (83rd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (64th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
1 X user
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
120 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
146 Mendeley
citeulike
3 CiteULike
Title
Defensive Medicine, Cost Containment, and Reform
Published in
Journal of General Internal Medicine, February 2010
DOI 10.1007/s11606-010-1259-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Laura D. Hermer, Howard Brody

Abstract

The role of defensive medicine in driving up health care costs is hotly contended. Physicians and health policy experts in particular tend to have sharply divergent views on the subject. Physicians argue that defensive medicine is a significant driver of health care cost inflation. Policy analysts, on the other hand, observe that malpractice reform, by itself, will probably not do much to reduce costs. We argue that both answers are incomplete. Ultimately, malpractice reform is a necessary but insufficient component of medical cost containment. The evidence suggests that defensive medicine accounts for a small but non-negligible fraction of health care costs. Yet the traditional medical malpractice reforms that many physicians desire will not assuage the various pressures that lead providers to overprescribe and overtreat. These reforms may, nevertheless, be necessary to persuade physicians to accept necessary changes in their practice patterns as part of the larger changes to the health care payment and delivery systems that cost containment requires.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 146 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 5 3%
Malawi 1 <1%
Unknown 140 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 23 16%
Researcher 19 13%
Student > Bachelor 18 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 7%
Other 33 23%
Unknown 30 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 55 38%
Social Sciences 14 10%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 6 4%
Business, Management and Accounting 5 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 2%
Other 23 16%
Unknown 40 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 March 2018.
All research outputs
#4,469,784
of 23,911,072 outputs
Outputs from Journal of General Internal Medicine
#2,861
of 7,806 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,643
of 171,640 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of General Internal Medicine
#14
of 42 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,911,072 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,806 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 171,640 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 42 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.