| Title |
Longterm outcomes after endoscopic mucosal resection for early gastric cancer
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Gastric Cancer, May 2006
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10120-005-0357-0 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Noriya Uedo, Hiroyasu Iishi, Masaharu Tatsuta, Ryu Ishihara, Koji Higashino, Yoji Takeuchi, Kazuho Imanaka, Takuya Yamada, Sachiko Yamamoto, Shunsuke Yamamoto, Hideaki Tsukuma, Shingo Ishiguro |
| Abstract |
Despite the widespread use of endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) in patients with early gastric cancer (EGC), its longterm outcomes have not been fully evaluated. Our aim was to evaluate longterm survival after complete EMR for EGC. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 39 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| France | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 38 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 6 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 13% |
| Other | 4 | 10% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 4 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 8% |
| Other | 9 | 23% |
| Unknown | 8 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 26 | 67% |
| Neuroscience | 2 | 5% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 5% |
| Unknown | 9 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 May 2015.
All research outputs
#7,355,930
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Gastric Cancer
#127
of 639 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,762
of 83,902 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Gastric Cancer
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 639 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 83,902 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them