You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Ordering effect and price sensitivity in discrete choice experiments: need we worry?
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Health economics (Online), January 2006
|
| DOI | 10.1002/hec.1117 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Trine Kjær, Mickael Bech, Dorte Gyrd‐Hansen, Kristian Hart‐Hansen |
| Abstract |
The objective of this paper is to analyse the impact that attribute ordering has on the relative importance of the price attribute. A discrete choice experiment was performed in order to elicit psoriasis patients' preferences for treatment. We tested for ordering effect with respect to the price attribute, and disclosed noticeable higher price sensitivity when the price attribute was placed at the end of the program description. Our results indicate that preferences are context dependent and that heuristics may be used in the choice process. Our result does not, however, suggest that ordering effect is a symptom of lexicographic ordering. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 94 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 2 | 2% |
| Ghana | 1 | 1% |
| Australia | 1 | 1% |
| Colombia | 1 | 1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 1% |
| South Africa | 1 | 1% |
| Denmark | 1 | 1% |
| United States | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 85 | 90% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 21 | 22% |
| Student > Master | 18 | 19% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 18 | 19% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 6% |
| Other | 10 | 11% |
| Unknown | 14 | 15% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 27 | 29% |
| Social Sciences | 11 | 12% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 10 | 11% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 8 | 9% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 4% |
| Other | 14 | 15% |
| Unknown | 20 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 March 2007.
All research outputs
#7,355,930
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Health economics (Online)
#1,460
of 2,666 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#37,653
of 174,005 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Health economics (Online)
#15
of 33 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,666 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.5. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 174,005 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 33 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.