↓ Skip to main content

Phytopathogen Lures Its Insect Vector by Altering Host Plant Odor

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Chemical Ecology, July 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
112 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
130 Mendeley
Title
Phytopathogen Lures Its Insect Vector by Altering Host Plant Odor
Published in
Journal of Chemical Ecology, July 2008
DOI 10.1007/s10886-008-9516-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Christoph J. Mayer, Andreas Vilcinskas, Jürgen Gross

Abstract

Many phytopathogens that cause worldwide losses of agricultural yield are vectored by herbivorous insects. Limited information is available about the interactions among phytopathogens, host plants, and insect vectors. In this paper, we report that the cell wall-lacking bacterium Candidatus Phytoplasma mali can alter both the odor of its host plant (apple) and behavior of its vector, the univoltine psyllid Cacopsylla picta. Apple trees infected by this phytoplasma emitted higher amounts of beta-caryophyllene when compared to uninfected ones. Psyllids that had no previous contact with Ca. P. mali, as well as infected pyllids, are more attracted by volatiles emitted from phytoplasma-infected apple plants than from uninfected ones. Psyllids that had developed on infected plants without getting infected showed the opposite behavior. These results suggest that the pathogen modifies host plant odor that lures its vector to infected plants. This may result in higher numbers of transmitting vector insects within the population.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 130 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Mexico 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 127 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 30 23%
Student > Ph. D. Student 21 16%
Student > Master 17 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 6%
Student > Bachelor 8 6%
Other 23 18%
Unknown 23 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 85 65%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 6%
Environmental Science 6 5%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 2 2%
Mathematics 1 <1%
Other 2 2%
Unknown 26 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 February 2017.
All research outputs
#2,455,788
of 22,754,104 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Chemical Ecology
#121
of 2,049 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,886
of 81,667 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Chemical Ecology
#2
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,754,104 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,049 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 81,667 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.