↓ Skip to main content

Outcomes of routine ilioinguinal lymph node dissection for palpable inguinal melanoma nodal metastasis

Overview of attention for article published in British Journal of Surgery, April 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
17 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
17 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Outcomes of routine ilioinguinal lymph node dissection for palpable inguinal melanoma nodal metastasis
Published in
British Journal of Surgery, April 2014
DOI 10.1002/bjs.9502
Pubmed ID
Authors

A. R. Glover, C. P. Allan, M. J. Wilkinson, D. C. Strauss, J. M. Thomas, A. J. Hayes

Abstract

Patients who present with palpable inguinal melanoma nodal metastasis have two surgical options: inguinal or ilioinguinal lymph node dissection. Indications for either operation remain controversial. This study examined survival and recurrence outcomes following ilioinguinal dissection for patients with palpable inguinal nodal metastasis, and assessed the incidence and preoperative predictors of pelvic nodal metastasis.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 17 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 6 35%
Researcher 2 12%
Other 1 6%
Lecturer 1 6%
Student > Bachelor 1 6%
Other 3 18%
Unknown 3 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 12 71%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 6%
Sports and Recreations 1 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 6%
Unknown 2 12%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 May 2014.
All research outputs
#15,299,919
of 22,754,104 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of Surgery
#4,469
of 5,241 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#133,871
of 226,936 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of Surgery
#38
of 47 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,754,104 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,241 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.9. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 226,936 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 47 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.