↓ Skip to main content

Can an Integrated Orthotic and Rehabilitation Program Decrease Pain and Improve Function After Lower Extremity Trauma?

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research, October 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (53rd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (63rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
70 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
115 Mendeley
Title
Can an Integrated Orthotic and Rehabilitation Program Decrease Pain and Improve Function After Lower Extremity Trauma?
Published in
Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research, October 2014
DOI 10.1007/s11999-014-3609-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Katherine M. Bedigrew, Jeanne C. Patzkowski, Jason M. Wilken, Johnny G. Owens, Ryan V. Blanck, Daniel J. Stinner, Kevin L. Kirk, Joseph R. Hsu

Abstract

Patients with severe lower extremity trauma have significant disability 2 years after injury that worsens by 7 years. Up to 15% seek late amputation. Recently, an energy-storing orthosis demonstrated improved function compared with standard orthoses; however, the effect when integrated with rehabilitation over time is unknown.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 115 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 114 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 20 17%
Researcher 17 15%
Student > Master 15 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 8%
Other 9 8%
Other 26 23%
Unknown 19 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 35 30%
Engineering 16 14%
Nursing and Health Professions 11 10%
Sports and Recreations 4 3%
Social Sciences 4 3%
Other 15 13%
Unknown 30 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 October 2015.
All research outputs
#8,647,757
of 25,655,374 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research
#2,460
of 7,323 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#88,830
of 266,196 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research
#53
of 148 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,655,374 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,323 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.8. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 266,196 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 148 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.