↓ Skip to main content

Occupational rehabilitation programs for musculoskeletal pain and common mental health disorders: study protocol of a randomized controlled trial

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Public Health, April 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (76th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
7 X users
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
45 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
211 Mendeley
Title
Occupational rehabilitation programs for musculoskeletal pain and common mental health disorders: study protocol of a randomized controlled trial
Published in
BMC Public Health, April 2014
DOI 10.1186/1471-2458-14-368
Pubmed ID
Authors

Marius S Fimland, Ottar Vasseljen, Sigmund Gismervik, Marit By Rise, Vidar Halsteinli, Henrik B Jacobsen, Petter C Borchgrevink, Hanne Tenggren, Roar Johnsen

Abstract

Long-term sick leave has considerably negative impact on the individual and society. Hence, the need to identify effective occupational rehabilitation programs is pressing. In Norway, group based occupational rehabilitation programs merging patients with different diagnoses have existed for many years, but no rigorous evaluation has been performed. The described randomized controlled trial aims primarily to compare two structured multicomponent inpatient rehabilitation programs, differing in length and content, with a comparative cognitive intervention. Secondarily the two inpatient programs will be compared with each other, and with a usual care reference group.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 211 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Ghana 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 208 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 32 15%
Student > Master 32 15%
Student > Bachelor 19 9%
Researcher 18 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 15 7%
Other 40 19%
Unknown 55 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 31 15%
Nursing and Health Professions 29 14%
Psychology 26 12%
Social Sciences 15 7%
Sports and Recreations 7 3%
Other 32 15%
Unknown 71 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 January 2020.
All research outputs
#6,274,339
of 24,754,593 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#6,366
of 16,401 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#49,426
of 208,542 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#87
of 259 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,754,593 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 16,401 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 208,542 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 259 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.