↓ Skip to main content

Comprehensive Sterilization of Malaria Vectors Using Pyriproxyfen: A Step Closer to Malaria Elimination

Overview of attention for article published in The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene, March 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
18 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
68 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Comprehensive Sterilization of Malaria Vectors Using Pyriproxyfen: A Step Closer to Malaria Elimination
Published in
The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene, March 2014
DOI 10.4269/ajtmh.13-0550
Pubmed ID
Authors

Dickson W. Lwetoijera, Caroline Harris, Samson S. Kiware, Gerry F. Killeen, Stefan Dongus, Gregor J. Devine, Silas Majambere

Abstract

One of the main challenges to malaria elimination is the resilience of vectors, such as Anopheles arabiensis, that evade lethal exposure to insecticidal control measures or express resistance to their active ingredients. This study investigated a novel technology for population control that sterilizes mosquitoes using pyriproxyfen, a juvenile hormone analogue. Females of An. arabiensis were released in a semifield system divided into four equal sections, and each section had a mud hut sheltering a tethered cow providing a blood source for mosquitoes. In all sections, the inner mud hut walls and roofs were lined with black cotton cloth. In one-half of the sections, the cloth was dusted with pyriproxyfen. An overwhelming 96% reduction in adult production was achieved in pyriproxyfen-treated sections compared with control sections. This unprecedented level of control can be exploited to design new vector control strategies that particularly target existing behaviorally resilient and insecticide-resistant populations.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 68 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 3%
Tanzania, United Republic of 2 3%
Unknown 64 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 13 19%
Student > Master 10 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 15%
Student > Bachelor 9 13%
Other 4 6%
Other 7 10%
Unknown 15 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 15 22%
Medicine and Dentistry 10 15%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 9%
Social Sciences 5 7%
Environmental Science 4 6%
Other 11 16%
Unknown 17 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 April 2014.
All research outputs
#17,286,645
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene
#7,613
of 9,523 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#150,532
of 249,577 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene
#39
of 71 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,523 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.6. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 249,577 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 71 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.