↓ Skip to main content

Gluten-free food prescriptions for children with coeliac disease: should families have to pay?

Overview of attention for article published in British Journal of General Practice, July 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (63rd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
12 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Gluten-free food prescriptions for children with coeliac disease: should families have to pay?
Published in
British Journal of General Practice, July 2017
DOI 10.3399/bjgp17x691829
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mark Tighe, Sarah Sleet, Sarah Currell, John Martin, John Puntis

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 12 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 12 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 2 17%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 1 8%
Librarian 1 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 8%
Lecturer 1 8%
Other 2 17%
Unknown 4 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 2 17%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 17%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 8%
Arts and Humanities 1 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 8%
Other 1 8%
Unknown 4 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 September 2018.
All research outputs
#7,221,937
of 22,994,508 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of General Practice
#2,342
of 4,300 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#114,964
of 317,332 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of General Practice
#59
of 91 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,994,508 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,300 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.8. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 317,332 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 91 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.