↓ Skip to main content

How can the response to volume expansion in patients with spontaneous respiratory movements be predicted?

Overview of attention for article published in Critical Care, July 2006
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (67th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (57th percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
1 patent
f1000
1 research highlight platform

Citations

dimensions_citation
158 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
138 Mendeley
Title
How can the response to volume expansion in patients with spontaneous respiratory movements be predicted?
Published in
Critical Care, July 2006
DOI 10.1186/cc4970
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sarah Heenen, Daniel De Backer, Jean-Louis Vincent

Abstract

The aim of the study was to evaluate the ability of different static and dynamic measurements of preload to predict fluid responsiveness in patients with spontaneous respiratory movements.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 138 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 135 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 24 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 12%
Student > Master 16 12%
Student > Postgraduate 15 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 13 9%
Other 39 28%
Unknown 14 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 94 68%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 5%
Engineering 7 5%
Mathematics 2 1%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 1%
Other 4 3%
Unknown 22 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 November 2022.
All research outputs
#7,356,550
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#4,042
of 6,554 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,040
of 82,354 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#8
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,554 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 82,354 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.