Title |
Electrical Conductivities of the Freshly Excised Cerebral Cortex in Epilepsy Surgery Patients; Correlation with Pathology, Seizure Duration, and Diffusion Tensor Imaging
|
---|---|
Published in |
Brain Topography, July 2006
|
DOI | 10.1007/s10548-006-0006-x |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
M. Akhtari, N. Salamon, R. Duncan, I. Fried, G. W. Mathern |
Abstract |
The electrical conductivities (sigma) of freshly excised neocortex and subcortical white matter were studied in the frequency range of physiological relevance for EEG (5-1005 Hz) in 21 patients (ages 0.67 to 55 years) undergoing epilepsy neurosurgery. Surgical patients were classified as having cortical dysplasia (CD) or non-CD pathologies. Diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) for apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) and fractional anisotropy (FA) was obtained in 9 patients. Results found that electrical conductivities in freshly excised neocortex vary significantly from patient to patient (sigma = 0.0660-0.156 S/m). Cerebral cortex from CD patients had increased conductivities compared with non-CD cases. In addition, longer seizure durations positively correlated with conductivities for CD tissue, while they negatively correlated for non-CD tissue. DTI ADC eigenvalues inversely correlated with electrical conductivity in CD and non-CD tissue. These results in a small initial cohort indicate that electrical conductivity of freshly excised neocortex from epilepsy surgery patients varies as a consequence of clinical variables, such as underlying pathology and seizure duration, and inversely correlates with DTI ADC values. Understanding how disease affects cortical electrical conductivity and ways to non-invasively measure it, perhaps through DTI, could enhance the ability to localize EEG dipoles and other relevant information in the treatment of epilepsy surgery patients. |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 2 | 3% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 1% |
Cuba | 1 | 1% |
Finland | 1 | 1% |
Unknown | 67 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 17 | 24% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 15% |
Unspecified | 7 | 10% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 6 | 8% |
Professor | 5 | 7% |
Other | 10 | 14% |
Unknown | 16 | 22% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Engineering | 12 | 17% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 11 | 15% |
Neuroscience | 11 | 15% |
Unspecified | 7 | 10% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 7% |
Other | 9 | 13% |
Unknown | 17 | 24% |