| Title |
Dementia: is the biopsychosocial model vindicated?
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
British Journal of General Practice, July 2017
|
| DOI | 10.3399/bjgp17x691781 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Steve Iliffe, Jill Manthorpe |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 33 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 20 | 61% |
| Australia | 1 | 3% |
| United States | 1 | 3% |
| Canada | 1 | 3% |
| Spain | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 9 | 27% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 18 | 55% |
| Scientists | 14 | 42% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 40 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 40 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 10 | 25% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 15% |
| Other | 3 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 8% |
| Professor | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 5 | 13% |
| Unknown | 11 | 28% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 8 | 20% |
| Psychology | 6 | 15% |
| Social Sciences | 4 | 10% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 10% |
| Neuroscience | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 5 | 13% |
| Unknown | 11 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 19. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 January 2018.
All research outputs
#2,020,594
of 25,918,104 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of General Practice
#978
of 4,929 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#37,872
of 330,243 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of General Practice
#31
of 91 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,918,104 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,929 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 330,243 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 91 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.