↓ Skip to main content

Does working memory training promote the use of strategies on untrained working memory tasks?

Overview of attention for article published in Memory & Cognition, April 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (91st percentile)

Mentioned by

news
3 news outlets
twitter
10 X users
peer_reviews
1 peer review site

Citations

dimensions_citation
97 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
277 Mendeley
Title
Does working memory training promote the use of strategies on untrained working memory tasks?
Published in
Memory & Cognition, April 2014
DOI 10.3758/s13421-014-0410-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Darren L. Dunning, Joni Holmes

Abstract

Adaptive computerized training has been associated with significant enhancements in untrained working memory tasks, but the nature of the cognitive changes that underpin these improvements are not yet fully understood. Here, we investigate the possibility that training stimulates the use of memory-related strategies. In a randomized controlled trial, participants completed four tests of working memory before receiving adaptive working memory training, nonadaptive working memory training with low memory loads, or no training. Open-ended interviews about strategy use were conducted after the administration of untrained working memory tasks at two time points. Those in the adaptive and nonadaptive groups completed the assessments before (T1) and after (T2) 10 training sessions. The no-training group completed the same set of tasks at T1 and T2, without any training between assessment points. Adaptive training was associated with selective improvements in untrained tests of working memory, accompanied by a significant increase in the use of a grouping strategy for visuospatial short-term memory and verbal working memory tasks. These results indicate that training-related improvements in working memory may be mediated by implicit and spontaneous changes in the use of strategies to subsegment sequences of information into groups for recall when the tasks used at test overlap with those used during training.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 277 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 1%
Poland 2 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
Unknown 268 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 60 22%
Student > Master 40 14%
Student > Bachelor 38 14%
Researcher 31 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 16 6%
Other 55 20%
Unknown 37 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 146 53%
Social Sciences 21 8%
Neuroscience 20 7%
Linguistics 10 4%
Medicine and Dentistry 9 3%
Other 30 11%
Unknown 41 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 30. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 September 2016.
All research outputs
#1,292,568
of 25,058,309 outputs
Outputs from Memory & Cognition
#93
of 1,630 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,452
of 232,775 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Memory & Cognition
#3
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,058,309 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,630 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 232,775 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.