↓ Skip to main content

The Dynamics of Urban Ecosystem Governance in Rotterdam, The Netherlands

Overview of attention for article published in Ambio, April 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (76th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
56 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
257 Mendeley
Title
The Dynamics of Urban Ecosystem Governance in Rotterdam, The Netherlands
Published in
Ambio, April 2014
DOI 10.1007/s13280-014-0512-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Niki Frantzeskaki, Nico Tilie

Abstract

We explore whether Rotterdam city has the governance capacity in terms of processes at place, and the attention in terms of vision and strategy to take up an integrated approach toward urban resilience. We adopt an interpretative policy analysis approach to assess the dynamics of urban ecosystem governance considering interviews, gray literature, and facilitated dialogues with policy practitioners. We show the inner workings of local government across strategic, operational, tactical, and reflective governance processes about the way urban ecosystems are regulated. Despite the existing capacity to steer such processes, a number of underlying challenges exist: need for coordination between planning departments; need to ease the integration of new policy objectives into established adaptive policy cycles; and need to assess the lessons learnt from pilots and emerging green initiatives. Regulating and provisioning ecosystem services receive heightened policy attention. Focus on regulating services is maintained by a policy renewal cycle that limits and delays consideration of other ecosystem services in policy and planning.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 257 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 2 <1%
Spain 2 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Czechia 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 248 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 62 24%
Researcher 44 17%
Student > Master 38 15%
Student > Bachelor 21 8%
Professor 11 4%
Other 39 15%
Unknown 42 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 72 28%
Social Sciences 47 18%
Engineering 18 7%
Arts and Humanities 12 5%
Design 11 4%
Other 41 16%
Unknown 56 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 April 2016.
All research outputs
#2,046,559
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Ambio
#355
of 1,954 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,861
of 240,598 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ambio
#7
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,954 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 240,598 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.