↓ Skip to main content

Teriflunomide and Its Mechanism of Action in Multiple Sclerosis

Overview of attention for article published in Drugs, April 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (89th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
11 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
277 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
371 Mendeley
Title
Teriflunomide and Its Mechanism of Action in Multiple Sclerosis
Published in
Drugs, April 2014
DOI 10.1007/s40265-014-0212-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Amit Bar-Or, Andrew Pachner, Francoise Menguy-Vacheron, Johanne Kaplan, Heinz Wiendl

Abstract

Treatment of multiple sclerosis (MS) is challenging: disease-modifying treatments (DMTs) must both limit unwanted immune responses associated with disease initiation and propagation (as T and B lymphocytes are critical cellular mediators in the pathophysiology of relapsing MS), and also have minimal adverse impact on normal protective immune responses. In this review, we summarize key preclinical and clinical data relating to the proposed mechanism of action of the recently approved DMT teriflunomide in MS. Teriflunomide selectively and reversibly inhibits dihydro-orotate dehydrogenase, a key mitochondrial enzyme in the de novo pyrimidine synthesis pathway, leading to a reduction in proliferation of activated T and B lymphocytes without causing cell death. Results from animal experiments modelling the immune activation implicated in MS demonstrate reductions in disease symptoms with teriflunomide treatment, accompanied by reduced central nervous system lymphocyte infiltration, reduced axonal loss, and preserved neurological functioning. In agreement with the results obtained in these model systems, phase 3 clinical trials of teriflunomide in patients with MS have consistently shown that teriflunomide provides a therapeutic benefit, and importantly, does not cause clinical immune suppression. Taken together, these data demonstrate how teriflunomide acts as a selective immune therapy for patients with MS.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 371 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 3 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Austria 1 <1%
Unknown 366 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 53 14%
Researcher 52 14%
Student > Master 38 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 36 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 33 9%
Other 58 16%
Unknown 101 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 92 25%
Neuroscience 38 10%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 33 9%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 26 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 21 6%
Other 47 13%
Unknown 114 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 April 2023.
All research outputs
#2,093,158
of 25,782,229 outputs
Outputs from Drugs
#224
of 3,485 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,261
of 239,469 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Drugs
#4
of 37 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,782,229 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,485 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 239,469 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 37 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.