| Title |
Co-ingestion of caffeine and carbohydrate after meal does not improve performance at high-intensity intermittent sprints with short recovery times
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
European Journal of Applied Physiology, April 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00421-014-2888-8 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Chia-Lun Lee, Ching-Feng Cheng, Chia-Jung Lee, Yu-Hsuan Kuo, Wen-Dien Chang |
| Abstract |
To determine the effects of co-ingesting caffeine (CAF) and carbohydrate (CHO) on high-intensity intermittent sprints (HIS) performance and physiological responses. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 5 | 45% |
| Italy | 2 | 18% |
| Spain | 2 | 18% |
| Unknown | 2 | 18% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 6 | 55% |
| Scientists | 2 | 18% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 18% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 9% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 128 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 127 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 24 | 19% |
| Student > Bachelor | 19 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 17 | 13% |
| Researcher | 10 | 8% |
| Professor | 6 | 5% |
| Other | 23 | 18% |
| Unknown | 29 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Sports and Recreations | 39 | 30% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 17 | 13% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 14 | 11% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 9 | 7% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 8 | 6% |
| Other | 10 | 8% |
| Unknown | 31 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 19. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 February 2015.
All research outputs
#1,977,774
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Applied Physiology
#647
of 4,345 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,409
of 240,721 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Applied Physiology
#11
of 51 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,345 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 240,721 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 51 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.