↓ Skip to main content

Staging of Alzheimer disease-associated neurofibrillary pathology using paraffin sections and immunocytochemistry

Overview of attention for article published in Acta Neuropathologica, August 2006
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#21 of 2,544)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (91st percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
2314 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
1746 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Staging of Alzheimer disease-associated neurofibrillary pathology using paraffin sections and immunocytochemistry
Published in
Acta Neuropathologica, August 2006
DOI 10.1007/s00401-006-0127-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Heiko Braak, Irina Alafuzoff, Thomas Arzberger, Hans Kretzschmar, Kelly Del Tredici

Abstract

Assessment of Alzheimer's disease (AD)-related neurofibrillary pathology requires a procedure that permits a sufficient differentiation between initial, intermediate, and late stages. The gradual deposition of a hyperphosphorylated tau protein within select neuronal types in specific nuclei or areas is central to the disease process. The staging of AD-related neurofibrillary pathology originally described in 1991 was performed on unconventionally thick sections (100 mum) using a modern silver technique and reflected the progress of the disease process based chiefly on the topographic expansion of the lesions. To better meet the demands of routine laboratories this procedure is revised here by adapting tissue selection and processing to the needs of paraffin-embedded sections (5-15 mum) and by introducing a robust immunoreaction (AT8) for hyperphosphorylated tau protein that can be processed on an automated basis. It is anticipated that this revised methodological protocol will enable a more uniform application of the staging procedure.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,746 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 5 <1%
Spain 3 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Canada 2 <1%
Denmark 2 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Czechia 1 <1%
Korea, Republic of 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Other 6 <1%
Unknown 1722 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 341 20%
Researcher 238 14%
Student > Bachelor 231 13%
Student > Master 194 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 91 5%
Other 253 14%
Unknown 398 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 420 24%
Medicine and Dentistry 251 14%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 222 13%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 155 9%
Psychology 64 4%
Other 178 10%
Unknown 456 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 289. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 November 2023.
All research outputs
#121,042
of 25,365,817 outputs
Outputs from Acta Neuropathologica
#21
of 2,544 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#138
of 83,807 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Acta Neuropathologica
#2
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,365,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,544 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 83,807 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.